8/31/2023 0 Comments Costco privacy guard vs lifelock![]() ![]() "(c) failing to meet the Permanent Injunction’s record-keeping requirements "(b) falsely advertising that it protected consumers’ sensitive data with the same high-level safeguards as financial institutions "(a) failing to establish and maintain a comprehensive information security program to protect its users’ sensitive personal data, including credit card, social security, and bank account numbers The order states that LifeLock violated the 2010 permanent injunction order by: Under these terms, LifeLock must continue to keep its marketing and advertising practices honest, and adhere to strict monitoring rules that allow the FTC to obtain documents, interview company officials, and even pose as LifeLock customers or employees in order to determine if LifeLock's in compliance. The FTC order extends the terms of its 2010 order to 2023, and adds a few new ones. It's still unclear how many cases this may be. A class-action case (below) is expected to take up to $68 million of that, with any unused portion, plus the remaining $32 million, going to victims from state Attorney General's Office cases, if any, he says. The entire $100 million will be used for LifeLock "victims" whose identities will be determined in future court proceedings, he says. Many details of what LifeLock actually did wrong still are sealed by a court order in the FTC's civil lawsuit against the company, Jay Mayfield, an FTC spokesman, tells New Times. District Court of Arizona within five days. ![]() The FTC released the terms of the order on its website (see below), stating that the money must be put in an escrow account with the U.S. LifeLock announced in late October that it had agreed to an FTC settlement based on its violations, slashing the company's stock price in half overnight. But in retrospect, CEO Todd Davis' statement about the "positive step" being taken by the company didn't quite foreshadow that it was about to pay what the FTC calls the "largest monetary award obtained by the Commission in an order enforcement action." LifeLock has been ordered to pay the "largest monetary award obtained by the Commission in an order enforcement action." tweet this The company, which charges customers a monthly fee for services it claims can protect against the crime of identity theft, failed to keep its customers' sensitive information secret and used deceptive advertising, the government says. Federal Trade Commission, it was announced today. LifeLock, the scandal-plagued anti-identify-theft company based in Tempe, has been ordered to pay $100 million for violating terms of a 2010 settlement agreement with the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |